首页
期刊简介
编 委 会
期刊订阅
百年学会 医星璀璨
名院风范
学科风华
菁英风采
投稿须知
过刊浏览
联系我们
篇名
关键词
作者
作者单位
摘要
关键词
注册本刊作者
作者投稿查稿
专家远程审稿
编辑在线审稿
编务办公专区
主编办公专区
下载文档
《上海医学》审稿费代缴委托书
《上海医学》杂志2024年征订启事
《上海医学》期刊编审系统审稿专家使用手册
工作动态
03-05
《上海医学》杂志2024年度“春蕾杯”论文评比征文通知
06-14
创新驱动,培育人才—《上海医学》2021年度春蕾计划评审结果揭晓
01-21
《上海医学》期刊影响力指标和学科排名取得显著提升
01-20
《上海医学》恭祝大家新年快乐!
08-18
作废声明
联系方式
发行周期:
月刊
主管单位:
上海市卫生健康委员会
主办单位:
上海市医学会
编辑出版:
《上海医学》编辑部
联系地址:
上海市北京西路1623号
邮编:
200040
电话:
021-62178606
传真:
021-62178606
邮箱:
smasmj@shsma.org.cn
ISSN:
ISSN0253-9934
CN:
CN31-1366/R
收款账号:
1001255309008900719
账户名:
上海市医学会
开户行:
工商银行上海市静安寺支行
友情链接
上海市医学会
当前位置:首页 >
过刊浏览
->
2010年第10期
体温对罗库溴铵残余肌松恢复和拮抗效果的影响
The effect of intraoperative warming on the recovery and antagonism of rocuronium-induced residual neuromuscular blockade.
浏览(2305) 下载(0)
DOI:
作者:
刘伍 李士通
LIU Wu, LI Shitong
作者单位:
上海市第一人民医院
Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai First People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080
关键词:
术中保温;罗库溴铵;肌松恢复,肌松拮抗
intraoperative warming; rocuronium; neuromuscular blockade recovery; neuromuscular blockade antagonism
摘要:
目的:观察在使用罗库溴铵的全麻病人中,术中保温对术后肌松恢复和残余肌松拮抗效果的影响。 方法: 40例全麻手术病人随机分为四组:不保温术后肌松自然恢复组(Ⅰ组)、不保温术后残余肌松拮抗组(Ⅱ组)、保温自然恢复组(Ⅲ组)、保温拮抗组(Ⅳ组),每组10例。异丙酚、芬太尼和0.6mg/kg罗库溴铵诱导插管,术中使用TOF-Swatch检测仪监测,T1恢复至25%时给予罗库溴铵0.15mg/kg。保温组用热毯加覆盖法保持体温。手术结束后当TOFR值恢复到0.6,用新斯的明0.015mg/kg和阿托品0.5mg拮抗肌松。观察并比较各组TOFR从0.6恢复至0.9的时间。结果:保温组与不保温组平均温度有统计学差异(36.7℃ vs 35.8℃,P<0.05)。保温与不保温组的TOFR从0.6至0.9自然恢复时间有显著统计学差异(15.5±2.59min vs 19.5±6.33min, P<0.05)。保温与不保温组的拮抗后恢复时间也有显著统计学差异(3.9±1.37min vs 6.3±1.95min,P<0.05);拮抗恢复显著快于自然恢复(P<0.01)。结论:术中保温有助于病人罗库溴铵术后的肌松恢复和拮抗。
[abstract] Objective: To investigate the effect of intraoperative warming on the recovery from rocuronium-induced postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade and on its antagonism with small dose of neostigmine. Methods: Forty patients for elective surgeries were randomly divided into four groups: groupⅠ, without warming and allowing spontaneous recovery of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade; group Ⅱ, warming and allowing spontaneous recovery; group Ⅲ, without warming but antagonizing the residual neuromuscular blockade with small dose of neostigmine; group Ⅳ, warming and antagonizing (n=10 each). General anesthesia was induced with intravenous propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium 0.6mg/kg.The neuromuscular transmission was monitored by TOF-Watch SX® acceleromyograph. Rocuronium was given when T1 recoverd to 25%.Patients were covered and electric blanket were used in warming group. The residual neuromuscular blockade was antagonized with atropine 0.5mg and neostigmine 0.015mg/kg in antagonism group when the TOFR reaching 0.6.The intervals of TOFR recovering from 0.6 to 0.9 were recorded. Results: There was significant difference in body core temperature between group with and without warming(36.7℃ vs 35.8℃,P<0.05). There was significant difference in the recovery intervals both between groupⅠand Ⅲ(3.9±1.37min vs 6.3±1.95min,P<0.05)and between groupⅡand Ⅳ(15.5±2.59min vs 19.5±6.33min, P<0.05). The recovery in antagonizing groups was much faster than those in spontaneous groups (P<0.01). Conclusion: Intraoperative warming accelerates spontaneous recovery and antagonizing from postoperative rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade.